Silk Road forums
Support => Feature requests => Topic started by: wildboy211 on July 08, 2011, 06:39 am
-
I think it would be a good idea to show when the last time a seller logged in either on their profile or in the listing.
-
I agree.
-
I don't want anyone to know my habits. Listings are suspended after 48 hours so you know they were on since then. If the indicator said "within the last 24 hours" that would be fine, but I don't want anyone to more about me or the other GreenCo admins.
-
I think it would be a good idea to show when the last time a seller logged in either on their profile or in the listing.
that defeats the purpose of staying under the radar from LE - they'd have a nice chunk of info putting the seller at risk. right here on the forum.
how about no. stalking sellers is not the way to get things done. how would you feel about your activities being logged for the seller? or for LE?
Kind Bud has a very good point. I wouldn't want anyone to know my habits either - and they don't.
~B
-
Quicker, easier, and safer just to encourage active sellers and buyers just to log into forums daily...no pgp necessary, and if they'd just check their thread, which most sellers seem to have, they could find out if problems arise. I don't like logging onto SR main, unless I have to...seems much more likely to be linked on there, than over here...could also just shoot a pm here, if needed. I'm leery of anything that logs/links us to transactions on SR...forums are just 'chat' among ourselves, nothing happening legal or illegal...
-
+1 on that
-
It seems that they have added this feature, i noticed it on one of the sellers profiles.
-
yup, i just noticed it on all sellers
-
I give a BIG +1 to all of the above. And to SR's responsiveness, again, to the comments of the posters here.
BUT...I really believe strongly that you need to have a cut-off, say at 100 transactions, where the line would read (from Aromatics as example):
"ranked #36 out of 284 sellers with 100% positive feedback from 100+ transactions" with the "100+" replacing the actual number.
I WOULD NOT want to be the guy showing I was #1 out of 284 sellers with 52,841 transactions when LE decided to get really serious about trying to hack into SR. That's painting a target on the best performing and most active sellers. :o
Which I AM SURE is not the intention of SR... :)
All these wonderful improvements are making me downright itchy to get back on the selling side. Or maybe that's just the oxy in me.... hehe.
-
I give a BIG +1 to all of the above. And to SR's responsiveness, again, to the comments of the posters here.
BUT...I really believe strongly that you need to have a cut-off, say at 100 transactions, where the line would read (from Aromatics as example):
"ranked #36 out of 284 sellers with 100% positive feedback from 100+ transactions" with the "100+" replacing the actual number.
I WOULD NOT want to be the guy showing I was #1 out of 284 sellers with 52,841 transactions when LE decided to get really serious about trying to hack into SR. That's painting a target on the best performing and most active sellers. :o
Which I AM SURE is not the intention of SR... :)
All these wonderful improvements are making me downright itchy to get back on the selling side. Or maybe that's just the oxy in me.... hehe.
I agree about the ranking system. That makes it easy for LE to determine whos doing the most volume and makes it easy for them to pick who to hit first. I really dont see the point of it anyways. As with the ranking system, i still dont get it, i think it should be:
Positives (3's,4's,5's) / Positives + Negatives (0's, 1's, 2's)
And of course add the lowest score of 0.
-
Well, my response is probably mis-posted and in the wrong thread, but I can't stand the fact that all my transactions, when I bought, who I bought from, the date, all that is listed and can't be deleted. Dumb.
-
Well, my response is probably mis-posted and in the wrong thread, but I can't stand the fact that all my transactions, when I bought, who I bought from, the date, all that is listed and can't be deleted. Dumb.
Am a little miffed about that too, not sure all that needs to be in the database at least the stuff that happened last month or further back.